From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Add charger subnode to tps65090 node
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519A763F.7030906@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519A42A7.5080208@nvidia.com>
On 05/20/2013 09:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 11:28 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 09:24 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>> On 5/17/2013 7:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> On 04/10/2013 01:51 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>>>> The charger is now represented by a distinct subnode of the tps65090
>>>>> device. Add this node and enable low current charging with it.
>>>>
>>>> What's the status of the TPS60590 bindings; are they agreed upon by
>>>> NVIDIA, TI, and SlimLogic yet? In other words, is this patch still
>>>> something I should apply for 3.11, or does it need to be reworked?
>>>
>>> I haven't seen any discussion with slimlogic or TI about the tps65090.
>>> As far as I know the bindings for this driver haven't changed.
>>>
>>> Laxman, do you think the work on the palmas driver will impact the
>>> design of the bindings for the tps65090?
>>
>> Sorry, perhaps I'm confusing two different chips. If TPS65090 isn't
>> Palmas, then ignore my question. In which case, I suppose I should just
>> apply your patch then?
>>
>
> I would say yes. The design of having the child node this way was how we
> had agreed worked best. The only reason I would see a significant reason
> to change this, is if something was decided that all mfd devices should
> start to follow some pattern which differed, which would mean changing
> existing bindings and therefore is unlikely.
OK, I have applied this patch to Tegra's for-3.11/dt branch. I also sent
a patch to actually enable the new driver in tegra_defconfig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-20 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 19:51 [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Add charger subnode to tps65090 node Rhyland Klein
2013-04-10 22:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-11 15:38 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-04-11 16:17 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-11 16:27 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-05-17 23:57 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-20 15:24 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-05-20 15:28 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-20 15:35 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-05-20 19:15 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-05-20 20:45 ` Rhyland Klein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519A763F.7030906@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).