[PATCH 0/4] Marvell PCIe driver improvements

[gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT)]

On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Thomas,
> 
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Bjorn, Jason, Andrew, Gregory,
>>
>> You'll find in this patch series 4 small patches that make various
>> improvements to the Marvell PCIe driver.
>>
>> I'd like those improvements to be kept separated from the original
>> PCIe driver itself: while the PCIe driver has been around and reviewed
>> for a long time, those improvements are newer. And I clearly do not
>> want the PCIe driver to miss 3.11 because of any problem that could be
>> found in those additional improvements.
> 
> Agreed.

All the changes are located in one single file drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c.
So as soon as they will be acked by Bjron, I think we can make a PR for them.
As nothing else depend of it, even if for a reason or another it is dropped,
there will be no reason to drop anything else.

> 
> For Bjorn and others:
> 
> The original patch series Thomas is referring to missed the merge window
> for v3.10 due to a build failure.  It is currently sitting in our mvebu
> repo.  The first three patches, "of/pci ..." are in mvebu/of_pci.  The
> rest of the series is on top of that in the branch mvebu/pcie.
> 
> I've sent pull requests for both branches to arm-soc.  There are two
> other arm SoC pcie efforts which are depending on mvebu/of_pci.  Hence
> why I did a separate branch.
> 
> Both branches are also merged into mvebu/for-next, and have survived
> linux-next for three days or so.  But, it's early, so we'll see how it
> goes. :-)
> 
>> Bjorn, with your Acked-by, could the Marvell maintainers include those
>> patches in their branch, merged through arm-soc? They already have the
>> Marvell PCIe driver itself, so I believe it makes sense to merge those
>> improvements through the same path.
> 
> I agree, please see above regarding arm-soc dependencies.
> 
>> Jason, those patches have been prepared on top of my marvell-pcie-v10
>> branch, I hope that's ok for you. If you want me to rebase them on
>> some other branch in which you have integrated the PCIe driver, don't
>> hesitate to tell me to do so. That said, since those patches are only
>> touching the driver itself and no other file, they should not cause
>> any conflict with other changes.
> 
> Should be fine, I'll let you know.
> 
> thx,
> 
> Jason.
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com