From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: valentin.longchamp@keymile.com (Valentin Longchamp)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:17:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: refactor dtsi to largest common nodes
In-Reply-To: <20130523114025.GO31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1369301130-29900-1-git-send-email-valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
 <20130523114025.GO31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <519E1700.5040906@keymile.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Jason,

On 05/23/2013 01:40 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Valentin,
> 
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
>> Some kirkwood variants (for instance present in the prestera SoCs) do
>> not have all the peripherals whose nodes are initialized in the
>> kirkwood.dtsi. These missing peripherals are SATA, SDIO, and RTC.
> 
> Could you provide a little more detail here about the exact problem this
> is solving?

Sure, I will add more detail.

> 
>> Their corresponding nodes are moved from kirkwood.dtsi to the
>> kirkwood-628x.dtsi files so that they still are initialized for these
>> variants.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-6281.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-6282.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood.dtsi      | 24 ------------------------
>>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> What about kirkwood-nsa310.dts?
> 

Argh, this one slipped through my net when I checked that all .dts except
km_kirkwood somehow include 628[x].dtsi.

I guess it would be OK to just include kirkwood-6281.dtsi in kirkwood-nsa310.dts
as well. Does someone have access to the HW to actually test it ?

Valentin