From: tushar.behera@linaro.org (Tushar Behera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Consolidate multiple low-level UART port definitions
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:28:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A811C8.9090509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMgt=zvPM7WoHn4VcUkw28j7+HDUvU2n3hNojx7Nr5PqJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/31/2013 02:41 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>> There are two definitions for low-level UART ports for Exynos platform.
>> CONFIG_S3C_LOWLEVEL_UART_PORT is used for printing "Uncompressing
>> Linux... done, booting the kernel." and CONFIG_S3C_UART for other
>> low-level messages.
>>
>> The assumption for both the uart ports is that they are pre-configured
>> in the bootloader. Since they are essentially the same always, it
>> would be good to consolidate them to use only one macro, in this case
>> 'DEBUG_S3C_UART' would be a better option.
>>
>> 'DEBUG_S3C_UART' is defined only if DEBUG_LL is enabled. We can safely
>> disable this option when DEBUG_LL is not defined and we can boot various
>> boards with different UART port settings. Only drawback of this
>> approach is that when DEBUG_LL is not defined, we would be missing the
>> print "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel."
>>
>> Since CONFIG_S3C_LOWLEVEL_UART_PORT is still used by other Samsung
>> boards, the consolidation applies only for ARCH_EXYNOS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>
> This looks reasonable, but you have to convert the other samsung
> platforms too -- it's not ok to ignore them.
>
Sure thing. I will update those platforms in a subsequent patchset.
>
> -Olof
>
--
Tushar Behera
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 4:40 [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Consolidate multiple low-level UART port definitions Tushar Behera
2013-05-30 21:11 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-31 2:58 ` Tushar Behera [this message]
2013-05-31 18:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-04 9:43 ` Tushar Behera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A811C8.9090509@linaro.org \
--to=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).