From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com (Srinivas KANDAGATLA)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:42:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ARM:prima2: move sirfsoc_of_rstc_init to
 .init_early
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4z65+SOCQM2XKmrda+5Hu9wRuZviSvW3As1ROa0SmdXqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1369993439-24216-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
 <1369993501-24309-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
 <CAGsJ_4z65+SOCQM2XKmrda+5Hu9wRuZviSvW3As1ROa0SmdXqw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <51A89ACE.8030604@st.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 31/05/13 13:24, Barry Song wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
> hi Sriniva,
> i think my "arm: prima2: move to generic reset controller driver
> framework" fixs this too:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg246206.html
I did look at the patch, I think it will fix it.

But the patch is still using arch_initcall directly, which means this
call will be attempted by every SOC in multi_v7 kernel.
This call can be easily hooked into machine descriptor.
In that way only prima compatible machines will attempt to call this
function in first place.

Do you know if the second issue of postcore init is fixed in any other
patches.

thanks,
srini