linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Planning the merge of KVM/arm64
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AE0D0D.3030106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMJs5B9PxHfUrugov4HJknQ24fG7MNp8obziqu9dnSztsGBksQ@mail.gmail.com>

Il 04/06/2013 17:43, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I don't think this is an issue. Gleb and Marcelo for example pulled
> RMK's stable tree for my KVM/ARM updates for the 3.10 merge window and
> that wasn't an issue.  If Linus pulls the kvm/next tree first the
> diffstat should be similar and everything clean enough, no?
> 
> Catalin has previously expressed his wish to upstream the kvm/arm64
> patches directly through him given the churn in a completely new
> architecture and he wants to make sure that everything looks right.
> 
> It's a pretty clean implementation with quite few dependencies and
> merging as a working series should be a priority instead of the
> Kconfig hack, imho.

Ok, let's see what Gleb says.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-04 12:29 Planning the merge of KVM/arm64 Marc Zyngier
2013-06-04 13:13 ` Anup Patel
2013-06-04 13:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-06-04 13:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-04 14:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-04 14:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-06-04 15:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-04 15:40       ` Will Deacon
2013-06-04 15:48         ` Steve Capper
2013-06-04 15:42       ` Marc Zyngier
2013-06-04 15:43       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-04 15:51         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-06-04 16:37           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-05  5:57             ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-05  6:01               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-05  9:31                 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-05 12:57                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-05 13:13                     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51AE0D0D.3030106@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).