From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:02:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: optimize memset_io()/memcpy_fromio()/memcpy_toio() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51AED468.9040109@de.bosch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28.09.2012 00:02, Russell King wrote: > If we are building for a LE platform, and we haven't overriden the > MMIO ops, then we can optimize the mem*io operations using the > standard string functions. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h > index 815c669..ed0577e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -249,9 +250,33 @@ extern void _memset_io(volatile void __iomem *, int, size_t); > #define writesw(p,d,l) __raw_writesw(p,d,l) > #define writesl(p,d,l) __raw_writesl(p,d,l) > > +#ifndef __ARMBE__ > +static inline void memset_io(volatile void __iomem *dst, unsigned c, > + size_t count) > +{ > + memset((void __force *)dst, c, count); > +} > +#define memset_io(dst,c,count) memset_io(dst,c,count) > + > +static inline void memcpy_fromio(void *to, const volatile void __iomem *from, > + size_t count) > +{ > + memcpy(to, (const void __force *)from, count); > +} > +#define memcpy_fromio(to,from,count) memcpy_fromio(to,from,count) > + > +static inline void memcpy_toio(volatile void __iomem *to, const void *from, > + size_t count) > +{ > + memcpy((void __force *)to, from, count); > +} > +#define memcpy_toio(to,from,count) memcpy_toio(to,from,count) > + > +#else > #define memset_io(c,v,l) _memset_io(c,(v),(l)) > #define memcpy_fromio(a,c,l) _memcpy_fromio((a),c,(l)) > #define memcpy_toio(c,a,l) _memcpy_toio(c,(a),(l)) > +#endif > > #endif /* readl */ I'd like to ask if there is any chance to get anything like this or the even older proposal http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-November/004077.html merged? Maybe an updated version incorporating the discussion conclusions? In the discussion of http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-November/004077.html there have been some doubts if it's a good idea to enable it for all SoCs. Therefore that patch introduced a config OPTIMIZED_IOMEM_MEMCPY which would allow us to enable it for only known to be compatible SoCs. Just in case this helps to get it applied ;) Many thanks and best regards Dirk