From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:30:39 -0600
Subject: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDyYt+pN+UaFuqWL5RrHpyuq_4So-tArmx3dr=0wLS+hwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPweEDx3mAy40BZrzrKPRbvg7vKMj7KevDQ3m_v4p6Yo50eSGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost>
 <CAPweEDwS3tR=wh-bZJb3vqR8fVQra=3XxDitowGRdH9c7WRfmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1733666.lHUBcfUXq9@flatron>
 <CAPweEDzYLDzh_-OWU61dtVhajZ40QpQgZKHFYDsh3FgF=r9_ag@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130606131042.GN18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAPweEDyYt+pN+UaFuqWL5RrHpyuq_4So-tArmx3dr=0wLS+hwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <51B218BF.60002@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 06/07/2013 02:02 AM, luke.leighton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> If companies are going to go off and invent the square wheel, and that
>> makes *them* suffer the loss of being able to merge back into the
>> mainline kernel, thereby making *their* job of moving forward with
>> their kernel versions much harder, then yes, we *are* happy.
> 
>  russell: they have more employees than sense :)  they also don't have
> any idea of what they *should* be doing, so this is an opportunity to
> educate them.

You know, they're probably reading this thread, and if not, they
certainly can in the list archives. It's probably not a good idea to
slag them off like that, and like other comments in this thread...