From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:22:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove unused voltagedomain data for AM33xx In-Reply-To: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> References: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Message-ID: <51BF0D86.7090703@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 17 June 2013 09:16 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi, > > The powerdomain framework currently expects to always have a voltagedomain > associated with a given powerdomain. We already have AM33xx which > has no Voltage Controller/Voltage Processor as part of PRCM. > There are more SoCs' to follow starting with AM437x and DRA7xx > which do not have VC/VP. All these SoCs', hence do not support any > form of auto-scaling of voltages, that was possible on earlier OMAPs' > using the VFSM to trigger an i2c communication to the PMIC automatically > on hitting a low power state. > > Instead of adding dummy voltage domain data files, like was done for the > AM33xx case, make the powerdomain framework aware of the fact that some > SoCs' might not really have support for auto-scaling of voltages in hw. > > Patches are based of 3.10-rc6 and are boot tested on am335x bone. > > Rajendra Nayak (2): > ARM: OMAP2+: Powerdomain: Remove the need to always have a voltdm > associated to a pwrdm > ARM: AM33xx: Remove the unused voltagedomain data > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 5 +++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h | 2 ++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm33xx.c | 7 ++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltagedomains33xx_data.c | 43 ------------------------- > 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltagedomains33xx_data.c > Nice !! FWIW, Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar