From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:57:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dma-mapping: convert DMA direction into IOMMU protection attributes In-Reply-To: <20130619085202.GC20351@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1370889285-22799-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <1370889285-22799-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <51C16DAF.1090205@samsung.com> <20130619085202.GC20351@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <51C1728C.9090205@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 6/19/2013 10:52 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi Marek, > > > On 6/10/2013 8:34 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > > IOMMU mappings take a prot parameter, identifying the protection bits > > > to enforce on the newly created mapping (READ or WRITE). The ARM > > > dma-mapping framework currently just passes 0 as the prot argument, > > > resulting in faulting mappings. > > > > > > This patch infers the protection attributes based on the direction of > > > the DMA transfer. > > > > > > Cc: Marek Szyprowski > > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > > > > Thanks for fixing this issue. Could I take this patch to my dma-mapping tree > > with other dma-mapping changes I've collected recently or do you want my ack > > and push it via other tree? > > Please, feel free to take it via the dma-mapping tree! That's probably the > best route for it and there's nothing that really depends on it anyway. Ok, thank I will put it on my tree. Thanks for your patches! Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung R&D Institute Poland