From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com (Srinivas KANDAGATLA) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:50:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] serial:st-asc: Add ST ASC driver. In-Reply-To: <201306202101.11261.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1371736996-8770-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com> <1371737103-8871-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com> <201306202101.11261.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <51C45A3F.7000009@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Greg, If its not too late can this patch be considered for 3.11 via tty tree? Arnd preferred to take the SOC patches in this series via arm-soc tree. Also, there is no build dependency for this patch. Thanks, srini On 20/06/13 20:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 20 June 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> This patch adds support to ASC (asynchronous serial controller) >> driver, which is basically a standard serial driver. This IP is common >> across all the ST parts for settop box platforms. >> >> ASC is embedded in ST COMMS IP block. It supports Rx & Tx functionality. >> It support all industry standard baud rates. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla >> CC: Stephen Gallimore >> CC: Stuart Menefy >> CC: Arnd Bergmann >> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman > >>>From my point of view the series is ready for merging in 3.11, > I only had a few final comments. I would prefer the first three > patches to go through the respective serial/clocksource/pinctrl > trees, since there are no direct build dependencies to the > platform parts. > > If there is a reason to take those through arm-soc, I would > insist on getting Acked-by's from the subsystem maintainers. > > Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > >