From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:44:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] at91: cpuidle: Fix target_residency In-Reply-To: <51C467A8.60303@atmel.com> References: <1371818219-13060-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <51C45320.8090102@atmel.com> <51C4539B.3020506@linaro.org> <51C467A8.60303@atmel.com> Message-ID: <51C474E9.40908@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/21/2013 04:48 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 21/06/2013 15:22, Daniel Lezcano : >> On 06/21/2013 03:20 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> On 21/06/2013 14:36, Daniel Lezcano : >>>> The following commit: >>>> >>>> commit 7e348b9012522fa0efd854d20d210d5e57fcedd1 >>>> Author: Robert Lee >>>> Date: Tue Mar 20 15:22:43 2012 -0500 >>>> >>>> ARM: at91: Consolidate time keeping and irq enable >>>> >>>> Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that >>>> handling from this code. >>>> >>>> introduced a zero to the state1 (suspend) target residency. >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>> + .states[1] = { >>>> + .enter = at91_enter_idle, >>>> + .exit_latency = 10, >>>> + .target_residency = 100000, >>>> + .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID, >>>> + .name = "RAM_SR", >>>> + .desc = "WFI and DDR Self Refresh", >>>> + }, >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>> - /* Wait for interrupt and RAM self refresh state */ >>>> - driver->states[1].enter = at91_enter_idle; >>>> - driver->states[1].exit_latency = 10; >>>> - driver->states[1].target_residency = 10000; >>>> - driver->states[1].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID; >>>> - strcpy(driver->states[1].name, "RAM_SR"); >>>> - strcpy(driver->states[1].desc, "WFI and RAM Self Refresh"); >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>> The cpuidle never enters this state since this commit. >> >> To be a bit more precise. With a periodic tick, the cpu never enters the >> state1 with both 10000 and 100000. >> >> With a tickless system, it enters to state1 much more often with the >> initial value, roughly x7 more. > > BTW Daniel, I think I can stack this patch on my fixes-non-critical > branch for 3.11: do you think that I should push for making it accepted > for 3.10 (even if it seems very late)? Yes, I think it should go for 3.10 as it is fix and also for 3.9.8 (stable). May be I should have Cc stable@ ... >> BTW, I am surpised with a sam926*, CONFIG_NO_HZ=y is not in the default >> config. > > Yes, indeed: we have to consider it. > > Best regards, > >>>> Fix it by setting the value to 10ms again. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >>> >>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre >>> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c >>>> b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c >>>> index 69f9e3b..4ec6a6d 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c >>>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver at91_idle_driver = { >>>> .states[1] = { >>>> .enter = at91_enter_idle, >>>> .exit_latency = 10, >>>> - .target_residency = 100000, >>>> + .target_residency = 10000, >>>> .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID, >>>> .name = "RAM_SR", >>>> .desc = "WFI and DDR Self Refresh", >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog