From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arch: arm64: include: asm: add pci.h to pass compiling
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:20:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CC11F7.2060306@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9028702.KGsxCx1772@wuerfel>
On 06/27/2013 04:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:30:40 Chen Gang wrote:
>> > On 06/26/2013 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:26:41AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> > > I wonder whether it makes sense to include pci-dma-compat.h in
>>> > > asm-generic/pci.h, I don't see why one would want the generic pci.h but
>>> > > not the generic pci-dma-compat.h (cc'ing Arnd).
>> >
>> > I think, it will let architecture guys easier to add their own
>> > pci-dma-compat.h (although they still need generic pci_dma_compat.h, and
>> > generic pci.h, too).
>> >
>> > e.g. one architecture want include generic pci-dma-compat.h firstly,
>> > then define its own features in its own pci-dma-compat.h.
> I think there is no excuse for still keeping the asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
> header around any more.
>
> All architectures use the same implementation and have done so for years.
> We should just convert the remaining users to use the dma_mapping.h
> interfaces directly.
in "asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h", it include "linux/dma-mapping.h" firstly.
So can we say it also has additional features (at least for compatible
old things) which "dma-mapping.h" not have ?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 3:26 [PATCH] arch: arm64: include: asm: add pci.h to pass compiling Chen Gang
2013-06-26 14:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-27 0:30 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-27 2:05 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-27 3:47 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-27 8:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-27 10:20 ` Chen Gang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CC11F7.2060306@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).