From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balajitk@ti.com (Balaji T K) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:56:50 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] AM33xx: MMC resources from DT without HWMOD data In-Reply-To: References: <1372209808-6532-1-git-send-email-joelagnel@ti.com> <51CC2A1E.2040003@ti.com> Message-ID: <51CC67CA.2070805@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 27 June 2013 07:56 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Joel, >> >> On 06/26/2013 05:28 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >>>> From: Joel A Fernandes >>>> >>>> This series is fixes to get MMC working on AM33XX without HWMOD data. >>>> On removal of HWMOD data, interrupt and register properties need to be provided >>>> for the driver to function correctly. >>> >>> Please don't pull patches authored by me in this series. I have posted >>> them with my wrong email address by mistake. I will correct my email >>> during the next repost, after a round of review. Matt's patches in the >>> series are still good though. >> >> In that case, please repost these in two series to avoid pulling the DTS >> files in the MMC tree. > > The series has been replaced with the single patch: > "[PATCH v2] ARM: dts: add AM33XX MMC support" > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137230403815943&w=2 > > Some patches were squashed and others dropped in the series resulting > in the single > patch above. This patch should be good to apply Hi Joel, Before pushing mmc dts support for am335x, Can you please let me know if below 2 patches [1] are merged/accepted, IIRC these patches are needed for MMC to work properly. I suggest to hold the dts patch until slave_sg_limit gets merged otherwise it will cause regression in am335x mmc. [PATCH v4 1/3] dmaengine: add dma_get_slave_sg_limits() [PATCH v4 2/3] dma: edma: add device_slave_sg_limits() support [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.kernel/khTTcPtQpag > > Thanks, > > -Joel >