From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Boot hang regression 3.10.0-rc4 -> 3.10.0
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:49:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBB96E.90600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130709064212.GB5552@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:12 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:03:54AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> On Monday 08 July 2013 07:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 06:50:01PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if this is because the timeouts get now initialized to 0 instead
>>>>>>>>>> of -1 for the serial driver?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You meant initialized to -1, right? There's an additional check for timeout being 0. Unless i
>>>>>>>>> am missing something DT-boot will start off with timeout set to 0 and then get forced to -1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue 2: Causing boot to stop when serial driver is initialized.
>>>>>> (After Issue 1 is fixed)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could narrow this down to the change done to return -EINVAL
>>>>>> instead of 0 in serial_omap_get_context_loss_count() as part of
>>>>>> commit 'a630fbfbb1beeffc5bbe542a7986bf2068874633' "serial: omap:
>>>>>> Fix device tree based PM runtime"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What this change in turn seems to do is cause a
>>>>>> serial_omap_restore_context() to get called as part of
>>>>>> serial_omap_runtime_resume() which was not the case when
>>>>>> serial_omap_get_context_loss_count() returned 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from serial_omap_runtime_resume():
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> int loss_cnt = serial_omap_get_context_loss_count(up);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (loss_cnt < 0) {
>>>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "serial_omap_get_context_loss_count failed : %d\n",
>>>>>> loss_cnt);
>>>>>> serial_omap_restore_context(up);
>>>>>> } else if (up->context_loss_cnt != loss_cnt) {
>>>>>> serial_omap_restore_context(up);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am still working on why a serial_omap_restore_context() could
>>>>>> have caused console to die. I will work with Sourav on this and
>>>>>> post the fixes for both issue 1 and issue2 once its clear on whats
>>>>>> really causing issue 2.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because we don't have the omap specific pdata callbacks for
>>>>> context loss any longer. We may be able to detect when the context
>>>>> was really lost in the serial driver, and only then call the
>>>>> serial_omap_restore_context().
>>>>
>>>> Right, but calling serial_omap_restore_context() even when the context
>>>> is not lost, should not ideally cause an issue.
>>>
>>> it does in one condition. If context hasn't been saved before. And that
>>> can happen in the case of wrong pm runtime status for that device.
>>>
>>> Imagine the device is marked as suspended even though it's fully enabled
>>> (it hasn't been suspended by hwmod due to NO_IDLE flag). In that case
>>> your context structure is all zeroes (context has never been saved
>>> before) then when you call pm_runtime_get_sync() on probe() your
>>> ->runtime_resume() will get called, which will restore context,
>>> essentially undoing anything which was configured by u-boot.
>>
>> This could be a problem for drivers which do a save context in ->runtime_suspend()
>> but from what I see with omap serial, there is no save context done as part of
>> ->runtime_suspend.
>
> right, because context is "saved" in set_termios. probe() will get
> called much before set_termios() has a chance to run, right ?
>
> Same problem will trigger in that case.
>
> I still think patch below is necessary
Right, I'll try some on those lines. Looks like a pm_runtime_set_active() is done
for the console in the non DT case in omap_serial_init_port(). It seems to be
missing in the DT case.
Although I feel this should fix the issue we have right now, I wonder if there could
ever be a case with uart being suspended and having to resume again before a
set_termios? What I mean to ask is, if the omap serial driver assuming a resume to
happen only post a set_termios is always valid.
>
>>> (completely untested, didn't even try to compile, just to illustrate)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>>> index 7341eff..d8dca68 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>>> @@ -2559,6 +2559,12 @@ static void __init _setup_postsetup(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>>> (postsetup_state == _HWMOD_STATE_IDLE)) {
>>> oh->_int_flags |= _HWMOD_SKIP_ENABLE;
>>> postsetup_state = _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED;
>>> +
>>> + /* tell pm_runtime this device is already active */
>>> + pm_runtime_set_active(&oh->od->pdev->dev);
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* tell pm_runtime this device is trully suspended */
>>> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&oh->od->pdev->dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (postsetup_state == _HWMOD_STATE_IDLE)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 13:25 Boot hang regression 3.10.0-rc4 -> 3.10.0 Mark Jackson
2013-07-04 15:14 ` Mark Jackson
2013-07-04 16:00 ` Mark Jackson
2013-07-05 8:11 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-05 11:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-05 13:20 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-05 13:31 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-08 11:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-08 12:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-08 12:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-08 13:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-08 13:20 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-08 13:25 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-08 13:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-09 5:33 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-09 6:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-09 7:19 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2013-07-09 7:40 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-09 18:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-09 19:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-10 12:16 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-10 12:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-10 8:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-07-10 12:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-10 12:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-10 14:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-10 16:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-10 16:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-11 6:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-11 9:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-12 0:40 ` Suman Anna
2013-07-15 6:44 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-15 10:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-15 19:23 ` Suman Anna
2013-07-16 6:30 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 9:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 9:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-11 10:16 ` [PATCH] arm: omap2plus: unidle devices which are about to probe Felipe Balbi
2013-07-12 11:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-12 12:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-12 12:27 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-13 22:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-07-11 9:59 ` Boot hang regression 3.10.0-rc4 -> 3.10.0 Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 10:27 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-17 7:10 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 6:18 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 6:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-11 9:11 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBB96E.90600@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).