[PATCH 0/4] pinctrl single support for SoC specific features

[rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros)]

On 07/10/2013 03:24 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [130710 05:16]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On 06/07/2013 11:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here are few patches to add support for SoC specific features
>>> to pinctrl-single. This is needed at least for omaps to support
>>> IO chain wake-up events from deeper idle states.
>>>
>>> With this patch series, device drivers can request named pinctrl
>>> states like active and idle from the PM runtime suspend and resume
>>> calls to set the wake enable bits for selected pins. Further
>>> the device driver can toggle the wake-up feature as needed based on
>>> the device_may_wakeup() state set by the standard sysfs
>>> power/wakeup entry.
>>>
>>> This is implemented in a separate pinctrl-single-omap driver that
>>> works together with pinctrl-single. This way the SoC specific
>>> are separated from the common pinctrl-single, and allows a relatively
>>> easy way to implement SoC specific things like wake-up events,
>>> pin interrupts, and GPIO.
>>
>> What's the status of this? Would be nice to get it in 3.12. I'm basing
>> the OMAP USB host wakeup support on this.
> 
> How about I'll push an immutable branch against v3.11-rc1 when it's
> tagged and send a pull request to Linus W for the first three patches?
> 
> That way we can base other branches on this if needed.

Looks good to me. Thanks.

cheers,
-roger