From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ARM: OMAP2+: Fix serial init for device tree based booting"
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:52:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DFCAF3.7040503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712091827.GH7656@atomide.com>
On Friday 12 July 2013 02:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> [130712 02:06]:
>> On Friday 12 July 2013 01:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, so that's only for earlyprintk then?
>>
>> yes,
>>
>>>
>>> If so, it seems the right fix is to set the NO_IDLE and NO_RESET
>>> flags based on ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OMAP4UART3 etc as that is selected
>>> in the Kconfig now.
>>
>> ok makes sense. It seems like the static data in hwmod can be populated
>> based on these defines? something like
>>
>> /* uart3 */
>> static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_uart3_hwmod = {
>> .name = "uart3",
>> .class = &omap44xx_uart_hwmod_class,
>> .clkdm_name = "l4_per_clkdm",
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OMAP4UART3
>> .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE | HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET |
>> HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE_ACT,
>> #else
>> .flags = HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE_ACT,
>> #endif
>> .main_clk = "func_48m_fclk",
>> .prcm = {
>> .omap4 = {
>> .clkctrl_offs = OMAP4_CM_L4PER_UART3_CLKCTRL_OFFSET,
>> .context_offs = OMAP4_RM_L4PER_UART3_CONTEXT_OFFSET,
>> .modulemode = MODULEMODE_SWCTRL,
>> },
>> },
>> };
>>
>> And same way for others? That way the cmdline parsing can be done away
>> with even for the non-DT case.
>
> Yes we can do it that way. How about add a common macro for it if
> it's always the same? Then the .flags line would be just:
>
> #define HWMOD_OMAP_UART_FLAGS(soc, port)
> ...
>
> .flags = HWMOD_OMAP_UART_FLAGS(4, 3),
Right, that seems much cleaner. I will send a patch out for it and get rid
of all the cmdline parsing in serial.c
regards
Rajendra
>
>>> The current code in mach-omap2/serial.c is wrong, and is a hack
>>> needed for the pdata based booting. What's broken is that
>>> omap_serial_early_init() parses the cmdline for console, which
>>> itself is pretty nasty, and it won't work the right way as
>>> there's nothing stopping from having the earlycon in a different
>>> UART from the serial console. So we just want to get rid of the
>>> whole mach-omap2/serial.c once we're all DT.
>>>
>>> So to summarize, we have two bugs:
>>>
>>> 1. Omap hwmod code can reset UART while earlycon may be using
>>> it. The fix to this is to use NO_IDLE and NO_RESET flags in
>>> the hwmod code if CONFIG_DEBUG_OMAPxUARTy is specified.
>>>
>>> 2. A bug in drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c where the
>>> missing context loss count can cause NULL context to be
>>> initialized during driver probe causing port to hang for
>>> earlycon. The fix for that is what Felipe has suggested or
>>> fix it in the driver by removing the context loss count usage
>>> and detect the need for context restore based on the UART
>>> state.
>>>
>>> Or am I still missing something?
>>
>> No, thats pretty much the 2 issues we have.
>
> OK thanks good to hear it's limited to earlycon issues.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 10:53 [PATCH 0/2] Fix omap serial early crash during hwmod _setup() Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ARM: OMAP2+: Fix serial init for device tree based booting" Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-12 7:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-12 7:31 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-12 8:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-12 8:59 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-12 9:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-12 9:22 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2013-07-12 9:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-12 12:12 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-12 12:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4+: Get rid of the HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE and HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET flags for uart Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-11 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix omap serial early crash during hwmod _setup() Felipe Balbi
2013-07-12 7:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-12 7:33 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-12 8:03 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DFCAF3.7040503@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).