linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/11] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_of_get_cpu_node
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:10:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E44943.7000600@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373883732-26303-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

On 07/15/2013 05:22 AM, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> 
> CPU subsystem now provides architecture specific hook to retrieve the
> of_node. Most of the cpu DT node parsing and initialisation is contained
> in devtree.c. It's better to contain all CPU device node parsing there.
> 
> arch_of_get_cpu_node is mainly used to assign cpu->of_node when CPUs get
> registered. This patch overrides the defination of the same. It can also
> act as the helper function in pre-SMP/early initialisation stages to
> retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical ordering.
> 
> This mainly helps to avoid replication of the code doing CPU node parsing
> and physical(MPIDR) to logical mapping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>

[snip]

> +struct device_node * __init arch_of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
> +	const u32 *cell;
> +	u64 hwid;
> +	int ac;
> +
> +	cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> +	if (WARN(!cpus, "Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(cpus, "#address-cells", &ac)))
> +		ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpus);
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
> +		if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
> +			continue;
> +		cell = of_get_property(cpun, "reg", NULL);
> +		if (WARN(!cell, "%s: missing reg property\n", cpun->full_name))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
> +		if ((hwid & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK) == cpu_logical_map(cpu))

Most of this function is not ARM specific, so it would be nice if we
could shrink the arch specific part down to just this match. A default
match of reg == logical cpu number might be useful.

The powermac cpufreq driver could probably also be converted
(arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c).

Other than that, this series looks good to me.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-15 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-15 10:22 [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: DT: update cpu device of_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16  6:27   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_of_get_cpu_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 19:10   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-07-16  6:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-16  9:03     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:16       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16  1:22   ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16  1:26   ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16  6:31 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: DT: update cpu device of_node Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E44943.7000600@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).