From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Add check for Cortex-A15 errata 798181 ECO
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:08:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E472FA.1080905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMjATn9MCzazUGmbD44XR8HyJZU4cCvmOEoUZsmCgutPUg@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/15/2013 03:59 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c
>> index 9a52a07..7fd64b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c
>> @@ -74,10 +74,21 @@ static inline void ipi_flush_bp_all(void *ignored)
>> static int erratum_a15_798181(void)
>> {
>> unsigned int midr = read_cpuid_id();
>> + unsigned int revidr;
>>
>> /* Cortex-A15 r0p0..r3p2 affected */
>> if ((midr & 0xff0ffff0) != 0x410fc0f0 || midr > 0x413fc0f2)
>> return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Check for Cortex A15 <= r3p2 with ECO fix */
>> + revidr = read_cpuid(CPUID_REVIDR);
>> + if ((revidr & 0x210) == 0x210)
>> + return 0;
>
> Reading and evaluating all this on every invalidate seems suboptimal.
> It should be possible to read just once and cache the result.
Yes, but I'm not sure it is so clear. 2 coproc reads may be faster than
a load potentially from memory. But then how much more code do we have
to fetch. How about something like this:
static int erratum_a15_798181(void)
{
static int errata_fix_needed = -1;
if (unlikely(errata_fix_needed == -1)) {
unsigned int midr = read_cpuid_id();
unsigned int revidr = read_cpuid(CPUID_REVIDR);
/* Cortex-A15 r0p0..r3p2 w/o ECO fix affected */
if ((midr & 0xff0ffff0) != 0x410fc0f0 || midr > 0x413fc0f2 ||
(revidr & 0x210) == 0x210) {
errata_fix_needed = 0;
return 0;
}
if (revidr & 0x10)
errata_fix_needed = 1;
errata_fix_needed = 2;
}
if (errata_fix_needed)
dummy_flush_tlb_a15_erratum();
return (errata_fix_needed == 2) ? 1: 0;
}
> I would have had the same comment about the original patch, but ARM
> pushes those to Russell in secret so it wasn't on the list. :-)
And I would have commented that we need to handle ECO fixes...
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 20:42 [PATCH] ARM: Add check for Cortex-A15 errata 798181 ECO Rob Herring
2013-07-15 20:59 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-15 22:08 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-07-15 22:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E472FA.1080905@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox