From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:50:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E6AF49.20403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374069984-20567-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
On 07/17/2013 09:06 AM, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>
> Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are
> parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need
> not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider
> that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some
> cases even incorrect logic.
>
> It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu
> device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However
> logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific.
>
> This patch adds of_get_cpu_node to retrieve a cpu device node for a
> given logical cpu index. The default matching of the physical id to the
> logical cpu index can be overridden by architecture specific code.
>
> It is recommended to use these helper function only in pre-SMP/early
> initialisation stages to retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical
> ordering. Once the cpu devices are registered, it can be retrieved easily
> from cpu device of_node which avoids unnecessary parsing and matching.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
One comment below, but otherwise for patches 1-4, 8 and 9:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Also, patch 3 needs to come before patch 2 or the matching will be wrong
if patch 3 is not applied.
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 5c54279..363b8f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,72 @@ const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *np, const char *name,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_property);
>
> +/*
> + * arch_match_cpu_phys_id - Match the given logical CPU and physical id
> + *
> + * @cpu: logical index of a cpu
> + * @phys_id: physical identifier of a cpu
> + *
> + * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific.
> + * However this __weak function provides a default match of physical
> + * id to logical cpu index.
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if the physical identifier and the logical index correspond
> + * to the same cpu, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
> +{
> + return (u32)phys_id == cpu;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_get_cpu_node - Get device node associated with the given logical CPU
> + *
> + * @cpu: CPU number(logical index) for which device node is required
> + *
> + * The main purpose of this function is to retrieve the device node for the
> + * given logical CPU index. It should be used to intialise the of_node in
> + * cpu device. Once of_node in cpu device is populated, all the further
> + * references can use that instead.
> + *
> + * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific and is built
> + * before booting secondary cores. This function uses arch_match_cpu_phys_id
> + * which can be overridden by architecture specific implementation.
> + *
> + * Returns a node pointer for the logical cpu if found, else NULL.
> + */
> +struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
> + const u32 *cell;
> + u64 hwid;
> + int ac, prop_len;
> +
> + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> + if (WARN(!cpus, "Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"))
What happens on a system with no /cpus nodes? Seems like this is another
case of adding new warnings to existing working systems.
I'd replace all the WARN's with a single pr_warn on any errors below.
For missing /cpus, I would just silently return.
Rob
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(cpus, "#address-cells", &ac)))
> + ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpus);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
> + if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
> + continue;
> + cell = of_get_property(cpun, "reg", &prop_len);
> + if (WARN(!cell, "%s: missing reg property\n", cpun->full_name))
> + continue;
> +
> + while (prop_len) {
> + hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
> + prop_len -= ac;
> + if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid))
> + return cpun;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-17 14:06 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 14:50 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-07-17 15:18 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-18 7:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-18 8:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 10:14 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 18:30 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-18 7:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Viresh Kumar
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 15:07 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 10:54 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 11:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 14:59 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 11:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 15:13 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 9:54 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 12:02 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-05 16:28 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06 8:25 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-06 9:02 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 17:01 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 18:55 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 9:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 9:41 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-21 5:10 ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 4:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 8:48 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 12:44 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 8:43 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:13 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-17 10:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 22:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-17 22:22 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-19 10:19 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 13:02 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:56 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:59 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 16:51 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-28 19:46 ` Grant Likely
2013-08-29 9:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-16 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:21 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:11 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:22 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22 6:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22 13:29 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 15:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-06 13:44 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 9:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 14:32 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 15:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 2:44 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 10:56 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 11:19 ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E6AF49.20403@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).