From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep KarkadaNagesha)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:36:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EE78D0.50803@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EE779A.8000205@monstr.eu>
On 23/07/13 13:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 01:32 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of my changes to remove duplicate code for parsing cpu nodes
>> in the device tree, I found few unnecessary code mostly around smp_init_cpus.
>> Most of the ARM Cortex A9 based platforms use SCU to get the number of cpus
>> while many others depend on the device tree.
>>
>> Even on DT based platforms using SCU, they can be made to depend on DT
>> to cpu count simplifying smp_init_cpus. In fact arm_dt_init_cpu_maps called
>> before smp_init_cpus, already does the device tree parsing, validating
>> nr_cpu_ids and setting the cpu_possible_mask appropriately.
>>
>> However this series targets only the platforms using DT for cpu count
>> (i.e. not using SCU)
>
> Just a note. Zynq is using SCU to get cpu count not DT.
>
Correct, when I saw that vexpress and zynq were only 2 platforms
setting cpu_present_mask which is unnecessary, I added Zynq last minute
to this series.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 11:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: keystone: remove redundant smp_init_cpus definition Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 13:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: vexpress: remove redundant vexpress_dt_cpus_num to get cpu count Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-09 9:25 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: mach-mvebu: remove redundant DT parsing and validation Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-08 14:54 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-08 15:19 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-08 15:50 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-09 13:11 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: highbank: remove redundant smp_init_cpus definition Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-23 15:34 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: zynq: remove unnecessary setting of cpu_present_mask Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 12:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code Michal Simek
2013-07-23 12:36 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [this message]
2013-07-23 19:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-24 10:48 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51EE78D0.50803@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).