From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: james.hogan@imgtec.com (James Hogan) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:07:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate In-Reply-To: <20130724183912.GC27761@codeaurora.org> References: <1371139562-305-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130621170407.20448.35605@quantum> <20130724183912.GC27761@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <51F0EAE8.90303@imgtec.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 24/07/13 19:39, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/21, James Hogan wrote: >> On 21 June 2013 18:04, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting James Hogan (2013-06-13 09:05:57) >>>> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent >>>> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate >>>> to that requested. It can be disabled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT >>>> flag (which is set for all uses of clk_register_mux(). >>>> >>>> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to >>>> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to >>>> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in >>>> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation. >>> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> I'm going to hold off on this one for 3.11. I'll revisit it after the >>> next merge window. >> >> Okay, no worries. >> > > Has a new patchset been sent out? I'd like to see this merge in > 3.12. Not yet, but I'll try and get it updated and resent early next week. Cheers James