From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arend@broadcom.com (Arend van Spriel)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:57:43 +0200
Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have
 people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
In-Reply-To: <CAKON4Ozfe=endqnXWkcWR2HuJ489Otpcu2QsjB0DNg6jpRgG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <1999586.84BnWE5EUh@thinkpad> <20130731191209.GA8027@netboy>
 <1409617.9untvfnOTJ@flatron> <20130731200017.GC8027@netboy>
 <20130731201457.GA24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAKON4Ow7rE9cDj_tS7kmYN4incM+ay=BK96q-ph2JxYH3xiQzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130731204817.GC24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAKON4Ozfe=endqnXWkcWR2HuJ489Otpcu2QsjB0DNg6jpRgG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <51FA3117.1080905@broadcom.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 07/31/2013 11:26 PM, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
> Alternatively you may be of the belief that it is impossible to get
> rid of the board specific code. But x86 doesn't have any of it, why
> should ARM?

Well, I am curious whether that will stay that way once x86 is truly 
moving into the embedded arena (if ever).

Regards,
Arend