From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:12:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates In-Reply-To: <51FB81FB.3060709@arm.com> References: <1371575223-21702-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1374492082-13686-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <51FB7CB8.6080103@arm.com> <51FB8081.6040501@linaro.org> <51FB81FB.3060709@arm.com> Message-ID: <51FBA21D.5010308@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/02/2013 11:55 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > On 02/08/13 10:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 08/02/2013 11:32 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On 22/07/13 12:21, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >>>> >>>> This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the event >>>> stream for architected timer. Since the timer control register is reset to >>>> zero on warm boot, CPU PM notifier is added to re-initialse it. >>>> >>> This series is required to support TC2 cpuidle. >>> It will be good if you can review and get this in for v3.12 >> >> So do you want me to take the series through my tree ? >> > Yes I believe it has to go through your(ARM specific clocksource?) tree, > but currently there's a conflict with another bug fix(that should come > from rmk as -rc fix) > (Commit ab8d46c0 "ARM: 7788/1: elf: fix lpae hwcap feature reporting in > proc/cpuinfo" in rmk -fixes) IMO, you should rebase this patch on top of tips/core, I will apply the series and when the rmk fix hits this branch (through tips/urgent), that will be up to the maintainer to resolve this conflict. -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog