From: holler@ahsoftware.de (Alexander Holler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] RFC: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FBD1CA.1000202@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FB8292.9090000@ahsoftware.de>
Am 02.08.2013 11:57, schrieb Alexander Holler:
> There must have been a bug in the patch too. I've also added that
> iinterrupt-parent stuff (with the same flags as used by the driver) and
> just have let the driver call
>
> request_threaded_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio), flags);
>
> without the gpio_request()/input() before. And request_threaded_irq()
Not to forget that it would/will be a big problem, if you will forbid
drivers to use gpio_request() when they use the gpio as irq (as it
was/is necessary now).
With my kernel 3.10.4 with some patches on top, I see
# git grep gpio_to_irq | wc -l
678
So there are a lot of places where
gpio_request();
gpio_direction_input()
request_irq();
would have been changed to
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
gpio_request();
gpio_direction_input()
#endif
request_irq();
to not fail during runtime (hopefully with some descriptive error
message if it fails).
Regards,
Alexander Holler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1375101368-17645-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-07-30 4:30 ` [PATCH] RFC: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs Grant Likely
2013-07-30 23:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-31 8:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-08-02 9:57 ` Alexander Holler
2013-08-02 15:35 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-08-03 7:23 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-10 7:00 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-09-10 13:17 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-09-10 15:00 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-09-10 15:48 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-09-10 16:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-09-11 7:05 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-11 7:16 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-11 7:30 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-11 7:36 ` Alexander Holler
2013-08-13 9:52 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-19 22:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-08-21 22:02 ` Linus Walleij
2013-09-06 15:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-09-11 15:30 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-11 16:14 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-09-11 17:42 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 8:55 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 10:11 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-09-12 10:28 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 11:09 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 11:26 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 11:37 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-12 15:19 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-12 15:57 ` Alexander Holler
2013-09-18 0:36 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-20 12:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-20 15:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-20 21:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-21 23:26 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FBD1CA.1000202@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).