From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 03:13:55 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx In-Reply-To: <20130805180625.5348.79570@quantum> References: <1374536965-3545-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <51FFDA70.7080900@samsung.com> <20130805180625.5348.79570@quantum> Message-ID: <51FFEB63.6060901@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/06/13 03:06, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-08-05 10:01:36) >> On 07/23/13 08:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> This series is an attempt to move clock support on Samsung S3C64xx SoCs >>> to Common Clock Framework. >>> >>> First, support for PLL types present on S3C64xx SoCs is added to Samsung >>> Common Clock Framework driver. Then the main clock driver for mentioned >>> SoCs is introduced. Further patches contain fixes for drivers to make them >>> compliant with CCF semantics, migration of platform code to use the new >>> clock driver and removal of old clock management code. >>> >>> Depends on: >>> - [PATCH v4 00/20] Samsung PWM support cleanup >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20856 >>> >>> On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible): >>> >>> Tested-by: Tomasz Figa >>> >>> For v1: >>> >>> Acked-by: Mike Turquette >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - added patch for read-only muxes, >>> - exported configurable muxes and dividers, >>> - defined mout_syncmux as read-only mux, >>> - in DT-enabled case fixed-clock binding is used to define external clocks. >>> >>> Tomasz Figa (8): >>> clk: mux: Add support for read-only muxes. >>> clk: samsung: pll: Add support for PLL6552 and PLL6553 >>> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for S3C64xx SoCs >>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Add soc_is_s3c6400/s3c6410 macros >>> ARM: s3c64xx: dma: Use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare >>> usb: host: ohci-s3c2410 Use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare >>> ARM: s3c64xx: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework >>> ARM: s3c64xx: Remove old clock management code >>> >>> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.txt | 77 ++ >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1007 -------------------- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.c | 21 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.h | 12 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dma.c | 4 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 132 +-- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 11 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6400.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c | 21 - >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6400.c | 6 - >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6410.c | 7 - >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 4 + >>> drivers/clk/clk-mux.c | 10 +- >>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 160 ++++ >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 4 + >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 465 +++++++++ >>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-s3c2410.c | 8 +- >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h | 178 ++++ >>> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 2 + >>> 28 files changed, 943 insertions(+), 1205 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.txt >>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c >>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h >>> >> Basically, this series looks good to me, but I'm not sure how this >> should be handled because of dependency with PWM cleanup and clk stuff >> in clk tree now... > > Patches 1-3 can go into the clk tree. 4-6 should go through their > respective trees. > > If you want I can take 7& 8 through the clk tree. > > Alternatively I can provide patches 1-3 in a separate stable topic > branch for you to pull in as a dependency. We'll both merge that stable > topic branch into our trees and you can make a note of it for the > arm-soc folks. > Thanks for your quick response. Would be helpful to samsung tree if you could provide a separate stable topic branch what you suggested for clk stuff in this series. Of course, I will inform when I send pull-request for this series to arm-soc. Thanks, Kukjin