From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:52:01 -0600
Subject: [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver
In-Reply-To: <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1376080035-29344-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <20130812163723.GK25111@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <520916E0.5030404@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> Whole series applied as follows:
>>>
>>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7)
>>>     |
>>>     +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6)
>>>             |
>>>             +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10)
>>>
>>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64.
>>>
>>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci.  Unless it all falls apart in -next,
>>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc.
>>
>> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a
>> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches?
> 
> It's as stable as I can make it.  I've tested it for all known build
> regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it.
> Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if
> appropriate.

OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then
it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might
change.

So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today.

Thanks.