From: bcousson@baylibre.com (Benoit Cousson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: node definition cleanups
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:45:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A1C52.7070401@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376154311-10184-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
+ Few TI folks to review and test.
On 10/08/2013 19:05, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While reviewing the submission of a DT file for a new board
> based on the am3352 SoC, I noticed that am33xx*.dts files needed
> some cleanups. All am33xx based board files redefine device nodes
> that are already defined in the included am33xx.dtsi file.
>
> This not only makes the DTS harder to maintain without any benefit
> but also leaks SoC internal details to board files such as how the
> OCP interconnect is modeled (currently just a flat representation)
> and the addresses of some IP modules that are part of the SoC and
> are not going to change from board to board.
>
> This patch-set cleans these board files and is composed of the
> following patches:
>
> [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: use pinmux node defined in included
> [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: don't redefine OCP bus and device
>
> NOTE: I don't own any of these am33xx based boards so I was only
> able to build test the changes. However I compared the generated
> dtb before and after the changes and the disassembled DTS with
> dtc -I dtb -O dts foo.dtb > bar.dts are identical.
>
> Even though the binary dtb is the same and there shouldn't be
> any visible changes, boot testing will be highly appreciated.
Thanks it looks good to me.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-10 17:05 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: node definition cleanups Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-08-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: use pinmux node defined in included file Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-08-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: don't redefine OCP bus and device nodes Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-08-13 11:45 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2013-08-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: node definition cleanups Mohammed, Afzal
2013-08-16 9:25 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-16 10:47 ` Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520A1C52.7070401@baylibre.com \
--to=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox