From: monstr@monstr.eu (Michal Simek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq DT changes for v3.12
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:50:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B1A89.8080704@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ioz9dt1c.fsf@kernel.org>
On 08/14/2013 02:18 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>>
>> I'm now helping out with arm-soc maintenance as well, and am on the
>> arm at kernel.org alias, so thanks for Cc'ing it.
>>
>>> please pull this simple DT change to your tree.
>>
>> Pulled into next/dt.
>>
>> In the future, it makes things simpler for us if you base on older -rc
>> releases where possible (c.f. similar request by Olof[1].) In this
>> case, it was trivial for me to rebase it onto -rc1 so I've done that
>> before applying.
>
> Looking closer (thanks to Olof), since your tree is already in
> linux-next, my rebasing this would cause problems in -next, so I can't
> rebase it.
That's correct but as you probably noticed this branch is not merged
to linux-next. (Only arm-next branch is added there). I want ask Stephen
for removing this branch anyway.
>
> Either you can rebase it to an earlier -rc (preferred), or I can pull in
> -rc5 into next/dt (which is currently causing an unrelated conflict
> which I'll have to deal with tomorrow.)
I wasn't aware about using earlier -rc. The last information I got
is that these trees should be based on Linux -rc (or tagged if you like) version.
I will keep this in my mind and will use earlier versions in the next pull requests.
It is just one single patch and I believe you have to use rc5
and resolve that all conflicts anyway that's why it is just question
of time when you have to deal with it.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130814/e0093f9b/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 14:50 arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq DT changes for v3.12 Michal Simek
2013-08-13 22:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-14 0:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-14 5:50 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2013-08-14 6:17 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-14 15:20 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B1A89.8080704@monstr.eu \
--to=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).