From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:08:25 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,
 palmas-usb-vid*
In-Reply-To: <520B14A1.8030809@ti.com>
References: <1376302675-15795-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
 <1376372241-15573-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
 <520A8555.10401@wwwdotorg.org> <520B14A1.8030809@ti.com>
Message-ID: <520BAB79.3000202@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 08/13/2013 11:24 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:43 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 11:37 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VID detector, so added a
>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Dint remove the existing compatible
>>
>> s/Dint/Didn't/
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-twl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-twl.txt
>>
>>>  PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
>>>  Required Properties:
>>> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb" or
>>> +   "ti,palmas-usb-vid".
>>
>> So are ti,palmas-usb and ti,twl6035-usb full EHCI controllers then?
> 
> No. I thought I shouldn't remove those if someone is already using those
> compatible value.

Sigh. Perhaps it's best to be consistent with the existing bad naming
then:-(