From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:20:06 +0200
Subject: [RFC 06/17] ARM: imx: remove custom .init_time hook
In-Reply-To: <20130820091000.GK31036@pengutronix.de>
References: <1376964271-22715-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
 <1376964271-22715-7-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
 <20130820072642.GJ31036@pengutronix.de> <52132D6C.2080606@gmail.com>
 <20130820091000.GK31036@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <521334C6.4070605@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 08/20/2013 11:10 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:48:44AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> On 08/20/2013 09:26 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> On i.MX5 the init_time hook calls mx5x_clocks_init_dt which calls
>>> mx5x_clocks_init which not only calls of_clk_init() but also registers
>>> all clocks in the system. You can't remove it.
>>>
>>> I am missing some
>>>
>>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(imx51, "fsl,imx51-ccm", imx51_clocks_init);
>>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(imx53, "fsl,imx53-ccm", imx53_clocks_init);
>>>
>>> Somewhere.
>>
>> Sascha,
>>
>> you are right, I forgot to add the two lines above as replacement for
>> the now removed direct call. If the general approach is accepted, I'll
>> add them for sure.
>>
>> Do imx51/imx53 still boot with CLK_OF_DECLARE added?
>
> I can test this once the whole series arrived here. So far I only have
> 6/16 and 10/17. I probably need at least 1/17.

Yeah, I am having troubles with linux-arm-kernel rejecting my mails
because of a suspicious header. I have no clue, what has changed lately
with my mails sent by git send-email to make them get stuck.

I didn't add all sub-arch maintainers to the whole set, that would
have been simply too many.

You need patches [1], [2], and 6 for imx which I will send a v2 in
a second. Ok for you to get them from lkml?

Sebastian

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/19/591
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/19/592