From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: josh.wu@atmel.com (Josh Wu) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:54:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: at91: ADC start-up time calculation changed since at91sam9x5 In-Reply-To: <20130815192711.GE12162@lukather> References: <1376219071-29946-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <1376219071-29946-4-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <20130815192711.GE12162@lukather> Message-ID: <5215DFC8.8090607@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Maxime On 8/16/2013 3:27 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Josh, > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 07:04:30PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >> Since in at91sam9x5, sama5d3x chip. the start up time calucation is >> changed. This patch can choose different start up time calculation >> formula for different chips. >> >> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu >> --- >> v1 --> v2: >> add a new variable for different start_time calculation. >> >> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c >> index b41eb60..9b0ffff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ >> (writel_relaxed(val, st->reg_base + reg)) >> >> struct at91_adc_caps { >> + bool start_time_use_lookup_tab; >> u32 mr_prescal_mask; >> u32 mr_startup_mask; >> }; >> @@ -700,13 +701,39 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> goto error_disable_adc_clk; >> } >> >> - /* >> - * Number of ticks needed to cover the startup time of the ADC as >> - * defined in the electrical characteristics of the board, divided by 8. >> - * The formula thus is : Startup Time = (ticks + 1) * 8 / ADC Clock >> - */ >> - ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk_khz / >> - 1000) - 1, 8) / 8; >> + if (!st->caps->start_time_use_lookup_tab) { >> + /* >> + * Number of ticks needed to cover the startup time of the ADC >> + * as defined in the electrical characteristics of the board, >> + * divided by 8. The formula thus is : >> + * Startup Time = (ticks + 1) * 8 / ADC Clock >> + */ >> + ticks = round_up((st->startup_time * adc_clk_khz / >> + 1000) - 1, 8) / 8; >> + } else { >> + /* >> + * For sama5d3x and at91sam9x5, the formula changes to: >> + * Startup Time = / ADC Clock >> + */ >> + const int startup_lookup[] = { >> + 0 , 8 , 16 , 24 , >> + 64 , 80 , 96 , 112, >> + 512, 576, 640, 704, >> + 768, 832, 896, 960 >> + }; >> + >> + int i, size = ARRAY_SIZE(startup_lookup); >> + ticks = st->startup_time * adc_clk_khz / 1000; >> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) >> + if (ticks < startup_lookup[i]) >> + break; >> + >> + ticks = i; >> + if (ticks == size) >> + /* Reach the end of lookup table */ >> + ticks = size - 1; >> + } >> + > Maybe just declaring two different functions here to calculate the > number of ticks, and just holding the function pointer in your structure > would make things more readable and future-proof? I'll do this in next version. thanks. > > Maxime > Best Regards, Josh Wu