From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52160CAC.3040603@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGVrzcaByva=8xiswcsW1B8G4dL=jY0RdaHKzNqaT_0Lrwbprg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Florian,
Thanks for your answer.
On 22/08/2013 14:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Boris,
>
> 2013/8/22 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch is a proposal to support the register/unregister/register
>> sequence on a given mdio bus.
>>
>> I use the register/unregister/register sequence to add a fallback when the
>> of_mdiobus_register (this function calls mdiobus_register with phy_mask
>> set to ~0) does not register any phy device (because the device tree does
>> not define any phy).
>> In this case I call mdiobus_unregister and then call mdiobus_register with
>> a phy_mask set to 0 to trigger a full mdio bus scan.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is the right way to do it (this is why I added RFC in the
>> subject).
>>
>> Could someone help me figuring out what I should use to implement my fallback ?
>>
>> 1) use the register/unregister/register sequence
>> 2) reimplement the "for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++)" mdiobus_scan loop
> I think solution 2 is nicer, in that case, would it be enough in your
> case to export a function called mdiobus_scan()? You could call at a
> time you know PHY devices have a chance of having been probed?
mdiobus_scan is already exported:
struct phy_device *mdiobus_scan(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr);
This function scans the presence of a phy device at a given address.
What I need is a loop which scan all the possible address on the given
mdio bus:
struct phy_device *mdiobus_full_scan(struct mii_bus *bus)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
if ((bus->phy_mask & (1 << i)) == 0) {
struct phy_device *phydev;
phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i);
if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
err = PTR_ERR(phydev);
goto error;
}
}
}
return 0;
error:
while (--i >= 0) {
if (bus->phy_map[i])
device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mdiobus_full_scan);
Since I am the only one who need this kind of functionnality right now,
I'm not sure
this is a good idea to export a new function.
This behaviour may be implemented in the of_mdiobus_register function:
when no dt phy node are found in the mdio bus dt node, we could launch a
full
scan.
What do you think ?
Best Regards,
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 12:33 [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:34 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:05 ` boris brezillon [this message]
2013-08-22 13:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:24 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 13:14 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 15:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-22 15:38 ` boris brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52160CAC.3040603@overkiz.com \
--to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).