From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:22:41 -0600 Subject: [PATCHv4 2/4] arm: dts: Change dw-apb-timer-osc and dw-apb-timer-sp to just dw-apb-timer In-Reply-To: <1377297883.26742.8.camel@linux-builds1> References: <1377189026-16656-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <1377189026-16656-2-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <52168E96.3020702@wwwdotorg.org> <1377297883.26742.8.camel@linux-builds1> Message-ID: <5217EEC1.3070005@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/23/2013 04:44 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 16:20 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/22/2013 10:30 AM, dinguyen at altera.com wrote: >>> From: Dinh Nguyen >>> >>> "dw-apb-timer-osc" and "dw-apb-timer-sp" are the same implementation of the >>> DW APB timer, just fed by different clocks. Thus, deprecate both >>> "dw-apb-timer-osc" and "dw-apb-timer-sp" in lieu of "dw-apb-timer". >> >> The binding change looks reasonable to me. >> >> The *.dtsi change will cause the new DT not to work with older kernels >> that don't support the new compatible values. Perhaps you're fine with that? >> >> I assume that the driver has already been updated to support the new >> values, and that the driver change is guaranteed to be merged before >> this change? Otherwise, git bisect will be broken for a while. >> > > Can I have your Acked-by: for these bindings? I just received an Ack > from Linus Walleij for the driver portion. Yes, the binding change, Acked-by: Stephen Warren