From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:16:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: Add common __clk_get(), __clk_put() implementations In-Reply-To: <20130823231314.GR6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1377270227-1030-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1377270227-1030-4-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <20130823231314.GR6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5218CE5B.1020906@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/24/2013 01:13 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:03:45PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> > This patch adds common __clk_get(), __clk_put() clkdev helpers which >> > replace their platform specific counterparts when the common clock >> > API is enabled. >> > >> > The owner module pointer field is added to struct clk so a reference >> > to the clock supplier module can be taken by the clock consumers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > I'm mostly happy with this now. > >> > +int __clk_get(struct clk *clk) >> > +{ >> > + if (clk&& !try_module_get(clk->owner)) >> > + return 0; >> > + >> > + return 1; >> > +} >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clk_get); >> > + >> > +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk) >> > +{ >> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk))) >> > + return; >> > + >> > + if (clk) >> > + module_put(clk->owner); >> > +} >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clk_put); > > Why are these exported? clkdev can only be built into the kernel, as can > the common clk framework - they can't be modular. So why would a module > wish to access these directly? I must have been mislead by the fact that some ARM sub-architecture exports those, have added them initially and then didn't think enough about it and left these in. Actually, at some point I noticed the exporting is not needed, but never did get around to remove it. Thanks. The updated series to follow.