From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:30:50 +0200 Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree In-Reply-To: <20130827161203.GA22852@quad.lixom.net> References: <20130827181353.319c150858829df1bb68d60b@canb.auug.org.au> <521C6961.9020103@linutronix.de> <521CA888.1080909@baylibre.com> <521CAF59.1090203@linutronix.de> <521CB046.9070408@baylibre.com> <878uznxjnl.fsf@linaro.org> <521CC4E3.8030204@linutronix.de> <20130827161203.GA22852@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <521CD43A.4040000@linutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/27/2013 06:12 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > No. Read that email again. What Benoit said was that if Felipe was fine > with the change _HE_ would take it. Huge difference, and one that would have > avoided this situation. Yes, I'm sorry. > The only way to solve these things in the future is to make the driver handle > both the new and the old binding. Bindings are not supposed to change in > incompatible ways any more, unless for special circumstances and/or when the > old binding was completely broken. The old bindings were completly broken. > -Olof Sebastian