From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:16:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] clk: samsung: pll: Use new registration method for PLL6552
 and PLL6553
In-Reply-To: <20130827011422.8231.95092@quantum>
References: <1374536965-3545-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
 <158901ce9b34$c0ac8720$42059560$@org> <20130820002258.4443.34197@quantum>
 <1856348.DCxTucbm8V@flatron> <20130827011422.8231.95092@quantum>
Message-ID: <521CDEDE.1070003@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 08/27/13 10:14, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-08-20 17:33:21)
>> This patch modifies PLL6552 and PLL6553 clock drivers to use recently
>> added common Samsung PLL registration method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>
> Sigh. This change won't apply on top of clk-next-s3c64xx since it
> requires Yadwinder's change (amongst) others.
>
> The best I could do was spin out another topic branch with the relevant
> changes and apply this patch on top. It is a subset of clk-next but it
> is almost entirely Samsung patches:
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-next-s3c64xx-delta
>
> Kukjin&  Tomasz, let me know if this OK for you to add as a dependency
> to the Samsung tree. If it is I will merge it into clk-next, but I want
> your OK that this branch is OK for you to take.
>
Hi Mike,

I merged the branch clk-next-s3c64xx-delta you provided on top of 
previous clk-next-s3c64xx for common-clk-s3c64xx and dt-s3c64xx and it 
looks fine to me.

Thanks,
Kukjin