From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP4+: Get rid of internal SRAM handling
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:12:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521DFE5D.8070000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521DFD5A.8050406@ti.com>
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 07:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 August 2013 02:29 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 August 2013 06:55 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> + Paul,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 27 August 2013 06:11 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>> Make all OMAP DT only platforms (am33xx, am43xx, omap4 and omap5)
>>>> use drivers/misc/sram.c driver instead of the omap internal
>>>> implementation for SRAM handling.
>>>>
>>>> Rajendra Nayak (2):
>>>> ARM: AM335x: Get rid of unused sram init function
>>>> ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT
>>>>
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>> arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c | 39 +---------------------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.h | 1 -
>>>> 7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> Really nice to see the SRAM code getting moved now. Thanks
>>> a lot Rajendra.
>>>
>>> - The sram_init() seems to be the post core init call.
>>> Hope this is not a problem for SDRC init which needs to have
>>> SRAM ready to update the DDR parameters.
>>
>> It should be fine given its needed only during core dvfs. Besides
>> drivers/misc/sram.c is useful only on DT platforms, so for now OMAP2/3
>> continue to use the omap specific sram handling.
>>
> Its used in early boot to initialize the DDR parameters and then
> later these can be used based on whether core DVFS supported or
> not. Look for _omap2_init_reprogram_sdrc() which has init
> dependency with omap_sram_init().
Right, I see that now. With this series (which addresses only DT platforms)
we would still be fine with the omap2/3 sdrc usage.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-27 10:11 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP4+: Get rid of internal SRAM handling Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-27 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: AM335x: Get rid of unused sram init function Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-27 16:06 ` Dave Gerlach
2013-08-28 6:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-27 10:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-27 11:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-28 6:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-28 10:24 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-29 11:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-09-03 13:56 ` Russ Dill
2013-09-03 14:35 ` Lucas Stach
2013-09-03 15:07 ` Russ Dill
2013-08-27 13:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] OMAP4+: Get rid of internal SRAM handling Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-28 6:29 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-28 13:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-28 13:42 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2013-08-28 14:46 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-10-08 18:34 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521DFE5D.8070000@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).