From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:17:02 +0100 Subject: 3.11-rc7 big-endian support In-Reply-To: References: <1377639509-22778-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <521D21D9.8020106@codethink.co.uk> <20130829115951.4d6df89b@skate> <521F2119.8080204@codethink.co.uk> <20130829122810.6f4c4e7a@skate> Message-ID: <521F820E.5080500@codethink.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 29/08/13 16:53, Victor Kamensky wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I wonder is it possible for you to review, > pick up, and include into your series this patch > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/195176.html > ([PATCH v3 0/1] ARM: signal: sigreturn_codes should be endian neutral > to work in BE8) > > I think it is very much relevant to the effort. > > It was tested on top of your series. And as far as I know > it is single patch outside of your series needed so BE > Linux LTP testing result will match LE results on the > same kernel h/w. > > Thanks, > Victor I have added it to my latest tree, and will re-post once the reviews are in tomorrow. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius