From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mikedunn@newsguy.com (Mike Dunn)
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:07:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver
In-Reply-To: <201309051734.40570.marex@denx.de>
References: <1378236233-15637-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com>
 <201309050011.01808.marex@denx.de> <5228A238.2090202@newsguy.com>
 <201309051734.40570.marex@denx.de>
Message-ID: <5228AC56.6020200@newsguy.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/05/2013 08:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>

[...]


>>> compatbile=marvell,pxa25x-pwm , no ? The lowest CPU with the block.
>>
>> Unless I am missing something, the compatible string does not need to
>> replicate any of the existing platform_device_id names, so wouldn't
>> "marvell,pxa" be better?  Except for register mapping and the number of
>> units present on a particular pxa variant, the peripheral is software
>> compatible across all pxa processors.  Plus there is the problem of the
>> 'x' wildcard in "pxa25x-pwm".
> 
> So use pxa250 ?
> 
> My concern is once marvell comes up with PXA1048576 which will have a different 
> PWM unit, then what will be the name for this new one?


I see.  OK then, pxa250 it is.

Thanks Marek,
Mike