From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ddaney.cavm@gmail.com (David Daney) Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:40:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ARM64: Move some signal code to a seperate file to be reused by ILP32. In-Reply-To: References: <1378762380-13152-1-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com> <1378762380-13152-2-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com> Message-ID: <522E4E53.8060308@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/09/2013 02:38 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> Since the ILP32 ABI uses similar signal code as the LP64 ABI, it makes sense to reuse rather >> than copy the same code. > > I just noticed that signal_template.c was not part of this patch but > it is included with patch number 5. > At a minimum, the patch set should be respun so that it builds, runs and has no unusable Kconfig options at all intermediate points in the set. You could also consider splitting out cosmetic changes unrelated to the meat of a change to a separate patches. David Daney