From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:33:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/12] clk/exynos convert clock IDs to macros
In-Reply-To: <070001ceafa5$d4d81a40$7e884ec0$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <1378462361-13680-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com>
 <8412301.YP2zzplWoe@amdc1227>
 <070001ceafa5$d4d81a40$7e884ec0$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <523716C9.3000204@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this moment...

I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic names instead
of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it is more
clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially annoying 
to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like 10 or 
more. What are you main concerns with this ?

--
Regards,
Sylwester