From: voice.shen@atmel.com (Bo Shen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PWM: atmel-pwm: use request/free instead of enable/disable
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:12:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5247FCF5.9090501@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380312628-6564-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Hi Alexandre,
On 9/28/2013 04:10, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> I found that disabling a pwm while it is at a low level will actually put it
> back at a high level. The main symptom is that leds-pwm is calling pwm_disable()
> after setting the duty cycle to 0. Hence, instead of getting a switched off LED,
> you get an LED lit up at full brightness.
>
> Solve that by using the request and free callbacks to enable and disable the
> pwm channels and the clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>
> This patch applies after:
> [PATCH v4] PWM: atmel-pwm: add PWM controller driver
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> index 6af7a50..4526e71 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int atmel_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +static int atmel_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm = to_atmel_pwm_chip(chip);
> int ret;
> @@ -225,23 +225,19 @@ static int atmel_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void atmel_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +static void atmel_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm = to_atmel_pwm_chip(chip);
> - u32 val;
>
> atmel_pwm_writel(atmel_pwm, PWM_DIS, 1 << pwm->hwpwm);
> -
> - val = atmel_pwm_readl(atmel_pwm, PWM_SR);
> - if ((val & PWM_SR_ALL_CH_ON) == 0)
> - clk_disable(atmel_pwm->clk);
> + clk_disable(atmel_pwm->clk);
> }
>
> static const struct pwm_ops atmel_pwm_ops = {
> .config = atmel_pwm_config,
> .set_polarity = atmel_pwm_set_polarity,
> - .enable = atmel_pwm_enable,
> - .disable = atmel_pwm_disable,
> + .request = atmel_pwm_request,
> + .free = atmel_pwm_free,
This will cause pwmadd_chip failure.
Code from <drivers/pwm/core.c>, in function: pwmadd_chip()
---8>---
if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->ops->config ||
!chip->ops->enable || !chip->ops->disable)
return -EINVAL;
---<8---
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-29 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 20:10 [PATCH] PWM: atmel-pwm: use request/free instead of enable/disable Alexandre Belloni
2013-09-29 10:12 ` Bo Shen [this message]
2013-09-29 15:54 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5247FCF5.9090501@atmel.com \
--to=voice.shen@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox