linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL]: clocksource: new material for 3.13
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:49:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5249B9AC.8050209@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5249B7E2.5060201@linaro.org>

On 09/30/2013 10:41 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> this pull request is based on 3.12-rc3 with the following content:
>
>  - Miroslav improved the RTC update by increasing the interval
> acceptable for an update in the sync_cmos_clock workqueue callback
>
>  - Prarit added a missing function declaration to fix a compilation
> issue on x86. Please *note*, this patch is coming from a pull from
> John's tree, it would make sense to cherry-pick this fix into
> timers/urgent
>
>  - Soren added FEAT_PERCPU to a clock device when it is local per cpu.
> This feature prevents the clock framework to choose a per cpu timer as
> a broadcast timer. This problem arised when the ARM global timer is
> used which is the case now on Xillinx.
>
>  - Stephen extended the generic sched_clock code to support 64bit
> counters and removes the setup_sched_clock deprecation, as that causes
> lots of warnings since there's still users in the arch/arm tree.
>
>  - Will and Sudeep implemented the event stream for architected timer.
> The event streams can be used to impose a timeout on a wfe, to
> safeguard against any programming error in case an expected event is
> not generated or even to implement wfe-based timeouts for userspace
> locking implementations.
>
>  - Zoran prevents to enter suspend mode if there are pending RTC
> timers to be handled, avoiding these ones to be delayed as well as the
> subsequent possible time critical code tied with them.
>


Hey Daniel,
    So this looks like a strange pull request. You based it on 3.12-rc3
instead of the current tip/timers/core (which is what your submitting
this to). Unfortunately since the branch you pulled from me was based on
tip/timers/core, this pull request seems to be submitting items that are
already in tip/timers/core (like the changes from Prarit, Miroslav and
Zoran).

Does any of the changes here actually depend on 3.12-rc3? If not you
might just re-generate the branch against tip/timers/core, and you'll
end up with a much cleaner pull request.

thanks
-john

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-30 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-30 17:41 [GIT PULL]: clocksource: new material for 3.13 Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-30 17:49 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-09-30 18:09   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-30 18:18     ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5249B9AC.8050209@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).