From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL]: clocksource: new material for 3.13
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:49:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5249B9AC.8050209@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5249B7E2.5060201@linaro.org>
On 09/30/2013 10:41 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> this pull request is based on 3.12-rc3 with the following content:
>
> - Miroslav improved the RTC update by increasing the interval
> acceptable for an update in the sync_cmos_clock workqueue callback
>
> - Prarit added a missing function declaration to fix a compilation
> issue on x86. Please *note*, this patch is coming from a pull from
> John's tree, it would make sense to cherry-pick this fix into
> timers/urgent
>
> - Soren added FEAT_PERCPU to a clock device when it is local per cpu.
> This feature prevents the clock framework to choose a per cpu timer as
> a broadcast timer. This problem arised when the ARM global timer is
> used which is the case now on Xillinx.
>
> - Stephen extended the generic sched_clock code to support 64bit
> counters and removes the setup_sched_clock deprecation, as that causes
> lots of warnings since there's still users in the arch/arm tree.
>
> - Will and Sudeep implemented the event stream for architected timer.
> The event streams can be used to impose a timeout on a wfe, to
> safeguard against any programming error in case an expected event is
> not generated or even to implement wfe-based timeouts for userspace
> locking implementations.
>
> - Zoran prevents to enter suspend mode if there are pending RTC
> timers to be handled, avoiding these ones to be delayed as well as the
> subsequent possible time critical code tied with them.
>
Hey Daniel,
So this looks like a strange pull request. You based it on 3.12-rc3
instead of the current tip/timers/core (which is what your submitting
this to). Unfortunately since the branch you pulled from me was based on
tip/timers/core, this pull request seems to be submitting items that are
already in tip/timers/core (like the changes from Prarit, Miroslav and
Zoran).
Does any of the changes here actually depend on 3.12-rc3? If not you
might just re-generate the branch against tip/timers/core, and you'll
end up with a much cleaner pull request.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-30 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 17:41 [GIT PULL]: clocksource: new material for 3.13 Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-30 17:49 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-09-30 18:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-30 18:18 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5249B9AC.8050209@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).