From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: check for number of arguments in syscall_get/set_arguments()
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:45:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524BC11D.2050003@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131001091919.GA17667@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On 10/01/2013 06:19 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:33:04AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> In ftrace_syscall_enter(),
>> syscall_get_arguments(..., 0, n, ...)
>> if (i == 0) { <handle orig_x0> ...; n--;}
>> memcpy(..., n * sizeof(args[0]));
>> If 'number of arguments(n)' is zero and 'argument index(i)' is also zero in
>> syscall_get_arguments(), none of arguments should be copied by memcpy().
>> Otherwise 'n--' can be a big positive number and unexpected amount of data
>> will be copied. Tracing system calls which take no argument, say sync(void),
>> may hit this case and eventually make the system corrupted.
>> This patch fixes the issue both in syscall_get_arguments() and
>> syscall_set_arguments().
>>
>> Please note, however, that asm-generic/syscall.h says,
>> * syscall_get_arguments - extract system call parameter values
>> * @i: argument index [0,5]
>> * @n: number of arguments; n+i must be [1,6].
>> and so we'd better change the caller's code(ftrace_syscall_enter).
>
> Since (most) other architectures deal with n+i == 0, please can you submit a
> separate patch updating that comment?
Yes, I will. But is the patch that only modifies a comment acceptable?
>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> index c89821f..01bb8cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
>> unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
>> unsigned long *args)
>> {
>> + if (n == 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (i + n > SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS) {
>> unsigned long *args_bad = args + SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS - i;
>> unsigned int n_bad = n + i - SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS;
>> @@ -86,6 +89,9 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
>> unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
>> const unsigned long *args)
>> {
>> + if (n == 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>
> Looks sensible. Please can you fix arch/arm/ as well?
Yes, I will.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-01 5:33 [PATCH] arm64: check for number of arguments in syscall_get/set_arguments() AKASHI Takahiro
2013-10-01 9:19 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-02 6:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2013-10-02 10:46 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524BC11D.2050003@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).