From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:41:53 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] usb: dwc3: omap: manage "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m"
 clock
In-Reply-To: <20131002131113.GM1476@radagast>
References: <1379508542-22389-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
 <1379508542-22389-10-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <52403E02.4070208@ti.com>
 <20131002131113.GM1476@radagast>
Message-ID: <524C22A1.30200@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/02/2013 04:11 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:11:30PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> On 09/18/2013 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is an optional functional clock to the
>>> UBS_OTG_SS module. So manage it in the driver.
>>>
>>
>> Just realized that "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is in fact functional clock to the 
>> PHY and not USB_OTG_SS module. The name is misleading.
>>
>> So please ignore patch 9 and 10.
> 
> ignored. All others are fine, right ?
> 
Yes. But I might have to rebase this on top of Phy framework stuff.

cheers,
-roger