linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors.
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:07:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52540388.8090709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381228895-24814-1-git-send-email-csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>

On 10/08/2013 05:41 AM, Majunath Goudar wrote:
> This patch adds a of_find_node_by_phandle() and of_get_next_parent()
> function declaration dependence on"#ifdef CONFIG_OF" in "include/linux/of.h"
> else part return inline dummy implementations (returning NULL). Without
> this patch,build system can lead to issues. This was discovered during
> randconfig testing,in which VEXPRESS_CONFIG was enabled w/o CONFIG_OF
> being enabled,leading to the following error:

What is blocking making VExpress DT only?

The subject should reflect the subsystem you are changing and the
description is missing spaces at a minimum.

Rob

> 
> CC      drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.o
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c: In function ?__vexpress_config_func_get?:
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> ?of_find_node_by_phandle? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
>     ^
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:16: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> integer without a cast [enabled by default]
>     bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  include/linux/of.h |    9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index f95aee3..968787d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ int of_device_is_stdout_path(struct device_node *dn);
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>  
> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline const char* of_node_full_name(struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	return "<no-node>";
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-08 10:41 [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors Majunath Goudar
2013-10-08 13:07 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-10-08 14:51 ` Majunath Goudar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52540388.8090709@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).