From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:12:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-mmio: handle BE guests on LE hosts In-Reply-To: <525C0622.8040504@redhat.com> References: <1381502171-8187-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <525BEBB4.4050603@redhat.com> <525BF089.9050408@arm.com> <2CDDB541-0E92-4452-831E-0B29B24A7C89@suse.de> <525BF656.7020207@arm.com> <20131014140527.GB5106@redhat.com> <525BFBF9.5010804@arm.com> <8C68DB9E-8391-4CF2-BB82-A49BDA26998B@suse.de> <525C0514.5030103@arm.com> <525C0622.8040504@redhat.com> Message-ID: <525C09D1.8060103@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 14/10/13 15:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 14/10/2013 16:52, Marc Zyngier ha scritto: >>>> Sure. And I imagine this traps back into the kernel to read some >>>> register and find out what the endianness of the accessing CPU is? >>> >>> Not yet. To be exact, it does the below today. But all virtio device >>> emulation is 100% guest endianness unaware. This helper is the only >>> piece of code where it gets any idea what endianness the guest has. So >>> by checking for references to it in the code you know where endianness >>> is an issue. And that's only in the config space. >> >> Only config space? How do you deal with virtio ring descriptors, for >> example? > > They also use guest endianness, but do not use virtio_is_big_endian() > (yet?) so Alex missed them. Yeah, I thought as much. There is a whole bunch of things that need byte swapping, both at the virtio level itself, and at the device level as well. Grep-ing for __u{16,32,64} through include/uapi/linux/virtio* shows the extent of the disaster. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...