From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:27:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree In-Reply-To: <20131015114035.6CA5FC40098@trevor.secretlab.ca> References: <1381476448-14548-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20131015114035.6CA5FC40098@trevor.secretlab.ca> Message-ID: <525D42CE.5010008@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 2013-10-15 13:40, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:27:26 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt pointed a few issues in the proposed design of > > device tree bindings for contiguous memory allocator and reserved memory > > regions: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/15/151 > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273548.html > > > > Some time has passed, but there is still no consensus on the bindings > > for the reserved memory and various drawback of this solution has been > > shown, so in my opinion the best I can do now is to revert them > > completely and start from scratch again later. > > I had some fixup patches that I was getting ready to post, but your > right. We're really late to be doing anything like that. I've applied > the reverts and we'll plan on hammering something out in Edinburgh next > week so that it can be merged for v3.13 Sadly I won't be able to go to Edinburgh because of other business trip the same time. However Tomasz Figa will be there for the whole week, he will also attend DT-summit, so I hope that you will manage to find a consensus. I will implement whatever you will agree then. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung R&D Institute Poland