From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:27:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] ARM: S3C24XX: add missing dma-devices and
 warning fix
In-Reply-To: <20131016020516.GT2954@intel.com>
References: <201310111059.19791.heiko@sntech.de>
 <20131013145642.GJ2954@intel.com> <201310132011.11285.heiko@sntech.de>
 <525DC274.8090808@samsung.com> <20131016020516.GT2954@intel.com>
Message-ID: <52643CA8.2020902@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/16/13 11:05, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:32:20AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> On 10/14/13 03:11, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>>> Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2013, 16:56:42 schrieb Vinod Koul:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>>>>> [I messed up the linux-arm-kernel list address yesterday, so I resend it
>>>>> with a fixed address, sorry for the noise]
>>>>>
>>>>> When Olof reported the warning about the unused s3c2410_dma_resource, I
>>>>> thought the best way forward would be to simply implement the missing
>>>>> pieces and so it has users :-) .
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore this series adds the necessary platform-devices for s3c2410,
>>>>> s3c2440 and s3c2442. This especially also includes the
>>>>> channel-constraints of those socs.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I do not have access to any of those socs these changes are of course
>>>>> compile-tested only.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want this to be applied thru dma or arm tree?
>>>
>>> hmm, the original series went into the samsung tree for 3.13, so maybe this
>>> addition should go the same way?
>>>
>> I think so, let me pick this up into Samsung tree for v3.13.
> Okay, sounds good. Ack for dmaengine patch sent
>
Applied with Vinod's ack, thanks.

- Kukjin